| MENU |
| Editorial |
| Reviewer |
| Publication Ethic |
| Focus And Scope |
| Author Guidlines |
| Peer Review Process |
| Plagiarism Policy |
| Author Fee |
| Copyright Policy |
| Open Access Policy |
| Archiving |
| Contact |
Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to JUPRA: Jurnal Pengabdian Terapan undergo a peer-review process to ensure academic quality and relevance to the journal’s scope.
Review stages:
-
Initial Editorial Screening
The editor evaluates the manuscript for scope suitability, completeness, and preliminary plagiarism screening. -
Reviewer Assignment
Manuscripts passing the initial screening are sent to at least one or two expert reviewers. -
Review Process (Double-Blind Review)
The identities of authors and reviewers are concealed to ensure an objective assessment. -
Reviewer Recommendation
Reviewers may recommend:-
Accept without revision
-
Accept with minor revision
-
Accept with major revision
-
Reject
-
-
Author Revision
Authors revise the manuscript based on reviewers’ comments and resubmit the revised version. -
Final Decision by Editor
The editor makes the final decision based on the review results and revisions. -
Publication
Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting and layout before online publication.




